View Single Post
Old 07-05-2011, 09:50 PM   #106
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe View Post
Definitely an interesting theory though; one that I had never heard of before. Sounds somewhat contrived, and more of a situation in a movie or TV show. But, I wouldn't entirely discount it if everything is as CC is saying,

And the investigators, prosecutors, and police bungled that case as a whole. So I wouldn't necessarily trust their expertise. The case might of been handled properly if it never became the public trial that it did.

Still shocked to this day that they found OJ not guilty. Believe whatever you want, but most people assumed he was guilty even before they heard the evidence. Once he "fled" the scene in his Bronco he was all but found guilty in the court of public opinion. Which is why it's hard to believe they found 12 jurors who all believed OJ was not guilty.
I wasn't in the least, the trial went on for far longer than any jury could cope with, the defense was limited but sensational and memorable, the prosecution was technical, endless and unmemorable, in the end a jury that was possibly predisposed to find him innocent, individuals on it who were no doubt contemplating book deals and the like after the verdict, went with about all they could remember, Johhny Cochrane and the gloves.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote