Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
|
When they quote Kevin Trenberth, you already know what the article's spin is going to be. Wow. Most of the article is anecdotal (which everyone knows is just "weather" - or at least it is if it isn't supporting AGW.) An insurance company will look for any reason to increase rates and what better way to label parts of the country as higher risk for extreme weather ("What? We can't help it - it's climate change!")
This is what Scientific American has been reduced to...sad.