Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
So says the man for the mighty FAR left. We are talking about the threat of instant cavities when reading this guy's PC-sweet-posts!
Comment's section?...............................digging big time......
I think had I not introduced this "information" site reaction from some Ivory Tower / PC people would be different. Hmmmmmmm 
|
???
So, I take it you disagree, and believe that this site is not C/conservative friendly, but an unbiased, down-the-middle publication (the first of its kind, to my knowledge)? Despite the fact that nearly all the supporters in the comments section (some of whom are of pretty dubious merit or prestige... like a guy I went to school with who went on to become a former MP's assistant...) are pretty clearly from the Right. I don't know any easier way to discern the political leaning of the media outlet.. other than glancing at the headlines, as previous posters have done.
www.foxnews.com
Just because I just sourced a right-wing media outlet above does not make me right-wing or unbiased. So how does the Bourqe site sourcing right/left papers have anything to do with it's own (obvious) political bent.
I also don't get what's wrong with admitting the site has a clear right-wing bias? Are you embarrassed by the right-wing? Is this paper? It doesn't seem to be, why would you?
Quote:
I think had I not introduced this "information" site reaction from some Ivory Tower / PC people would be different. Hmmmmmmm
|
I haven't attacked one peice of information you've brought up in this thread. You're a drowning man thrashing about.