Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame Of Liberty
So the Flames should have cut off the nose to spite the face?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears
In that case, I guess your point is the Flames should have cut off their nose to spite their face?
|
the2bears, are you trying to be original here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears
Here, found your problem. It's in the use of the word "allowing". That's where you're missing the point. I don't think the Flames "allowed" this to happen, it was pretty much out of their control.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears
Sure, they could have dictated what happened as per your plan.
|
I think you proved my last point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears
However, they would have come out with less than what they got now. I'm not sure, I don't think it's worth it losing on the deal to make a point
|
I'm not sure either. That's why I said that I don't blame Feaster for taking the best offer but that part of me that wished Feaster didn't trade Erixon to the NYR. If it sets a bad precedence, it may be worth it to lose the deal to make a point. That's how it goes sometimes.