Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire
I am saying he should have called their bluff. I, unlike many others, am not a big fan on the return we got. We basically got three assets that may or may not ever play in the NHL for a guy that is likely to be in the NHL next year. Its obvious Erixon wanted to play in New York and Rangers wanted him too. Call their bluff and see if they fold, I think Rangers knew he they couldn't get him at 15 and I don't think Erixon is any position to risk where he ends up, what if its Edmonton or Winnipeg who drafted him. I am not saying Feaster Completely failed, but given that he had 4 weeks to gauge Erixon on a entry level contract, he certainly dropped the ball to a certain extent.
|
You know, unlike some others, I definitely don't think Erixon would be drafted in the top 10. While I certainly think some team would take him in the first round, I don't really see Erixon improving his draft position all that much. Had Erixon re-entered the draft, I'm confident Erixon would have been there when the Rangers pick UNLESS the Flames chose to draft Erixon again. For me, it's a case where the Rangers don't want to use their first to select Erixon rather than knowing Erixon won't be there.
With that said, part of me wanted Feaster to give Erixon a big F U. Trade Erixon to some other team even if it meant a lesser return. Or let Erixon re-enter the draft and either re-draft Erixon, let Erixon go to another team, or let Rangers use their first on Erixon. It sucks, but it sends the right message.
As it stands, regardless of the return, I can't help but think the Flames got bent over. I'm not blaming Feaster for seeking the best return. But like I said, part of me wish he didn't take the Rangers deal. This really sets a bad precedent and there might come a day when Feaster is hated around the league for this.