Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Supreme Court opinions have indicated that to not be the case, at least for certain members of the court.
|
Got any links? I'm interested to hear how they think that something that is not mandatory for one gender and readily available for both genders is in any way, shape or form discriminatory.
Coming back to the statistical angle again, if men are more likely to get in a car accident, which is justification for them paying higher auto insurance premiums, then women being statistically more likely to get pregnant should be justification for them having to pay higher premiums. I'm sure you will disagree, but I guess this is just a matter of some levels of sexism being acceptable.