Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
Women can get pregnant; Men can't. That isn't government discrimination. It is nature. Moreover many if not most women wouldn't consider abortion insurance to be desireable. Many women oppose abortion; Others would welcome a child into this world; Some aren't sexually active.
|
It's actually kind of fun watching you flail away searching to grasp a point and failing miserably time and time again. I'm trying to figure out how to get this through to you but it's looking rather hopeless. I'll try once more.
A law. That impacts one gender. In a disproportionate manner. Is discriminatory.
This law. Impacts women. Exclusively.
See how that works? The fact that only women are impacted is the whole crux of the argument, whether that is due to biological differences doesn't matter. The state is imposing a burden on one gender through the requirement to purchase certain insurance policies individually. No man will ever be impacted by this law, every single woman is potentially impacted. There are certainly counter arguments, but to suggest that this isn't actually discriminatory shows an astounding degree of ignorance.
Btw, what's with the throwing in a completely unrelated comment in every reply? Just hoping that people will latch on to that so you can duck out of an issue you don't understand?