Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
Oh, I see how it is. Because the Supreme Court ruling didn't go your way, you think it's invalid and will eventually be revisited and overturned. Good luck with that. Until such a day comes (and I highly doubt it ever will), officials of the US government must comply with the ruling.
|
And until that day comes civil disobedience should and will be practiced. A bad ruling by the Supreme court shouldn't limit folks religious expression.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
He's a victim because the government was attempting to violate his constitutional right to religious freedom. He fought back and defended his rights, forcing the school to back down because they were absolutely in the wrong as determined by their own lawyers.
|
So you concede that atheism is a religion? Because I was under the impression that he didn't have a religion to violate. Perhaps Atheism is the "unreligion" and you folks see it as your mandate to stifle all other religious expression. Because that is more believable then your contention that atheist boy was going to be harmed by a little public prayer. One thing is clear; your unreligion is full of real intolerance.