Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
He's right that Wikipedia should not be cited as a source in an academic paper, but most reasonable people will agree that it's "good enough" for an informal internet discussion.
I'm convinced he must be trolling us if his counter-argument is to attack the credibility of Wikipedia as a source of info.
|
Oh, I'm well aware of that, but I think we can all agree that Wikipedia is a great source of infromation and there is no reason to believe a page is all lies because the page doesn't suit your opinion on a subject.
If a Wikipedia page shared his opinion I'm sure he'd be the first to post a Wikipedia link.