Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades
Talk about strawman arguments, photon. Right after you disparage someone for using them no less.
Archeological evidence supports everything that has been recorded in the Bible. Times. Dates. Events. Using your scientific approach, it's up to you to prove to me that the Bible doesn't actually, right?
And your ignorance of the Bible is evident with comments such as "Bible itself has contradicting points of view on the afterlife from OT to NT."
Normally I take a much more diplomatic approach to debates, but it's hard to have a discussion with someone that doesn't even know the basics of what they're trying to disprove in the first place.
Edit: And before you quote two scriptures in the OT and NT, I suggest you read the context and do the research, so you don't look foolish for trying to follow up on your false assertion.
|
Archeological evidence supports the basic setting in Richard III by Shakespeare. Does that make that play true? Good lord what a bad argument.