[pylon]

Originally Posted by Calgaryborn

Firstly, I've contributed far more to these endless bash christianity threads than you have.

Secondly, you(meaning CP) are not that important. I have many relationships and responsibilities that come before you. I'm not going to respond every time one of you atheist get into a little snit. If I did that I would never be off CP. Since my last post I've fed my children,gone to church, watch NCIS, prayed, studied, slept, sprayed my lawn and the neigbours for broad leaf, went shopping and read some news. All these things trumped you.

Lastly, I have nothing to defend. My opinion of Stephen Hawkings limitations are as valid as yours of Kirk Cameron. He lives in his academic world and that is all he knows. His disability has even restricted that world more. It's like a guy who is looking through a rifle scope and seeing a vast distance but, can't see the buck wandering by on his left. At the end of the day he swears there was no game in the bush.

Steven Hawking is a blind man denying the existance of colour. Science can't put God or history under a microscope. They can't view either through a telescope. They can see marvellous things through both but, not how they got there. For that question Kirk Cameron has an advantage over Stephen Hawkings. He hasn't limited himself to see through one singular prism: science.

To be clear here, you are siding with Miiiiiike, over one of the most brilliant minds to ever grace humanity.

You sir, are an.......