Just incase it's been lost in the shuffle, I've argued from the start that the golfer is responsible, but not 100%
the percentage of responsibility should be contextual depending on the hole, placement of the houses, etc (theoretically if a golfer purposely hit a ball to break a window then yes 100%, if the course has a net up and the net is shabby and the ball goes through it and still breaks a window then 0%, however it would probably lie somewhere in between with the golfer paying north of 50%)
__________________
"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
|