Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
My one writer? I'm citing experts in the field, not opinion pieces from columnists. Do you understand the difference?
And what the hell does your second question have to do with any of this? Those are completely unrelated things. For the record my 'final statement' is that the NHL will stay in Phoenix as long as the losses are acceptable, but I have no idea what the threshold is.
|
You quoted one article and writer. You may have quoted many before, but that was pages before you and I started talking.
I was just interested in your stand. Often in discussions like this, and I am guilty of it as well, people get so wrapped up in nitpicking, the forget the larger issue. They get so mad at point or slights, the forget what they are even arguing.
Or worse, they just jumped in to smoke a point.
I believe Winnipeg will have a team this summer or next, and it will come from Atlanta or Phoenix. That is interesting, but it concerns me less than the state of the league and the decision making of the leaders. To me this whole fiasco proves that those in charge don't know where the money is coming from and are willing to take big risks to prove themselves right. To knock it out of the park as I stated. Which has not happened since they started, and will probably not happen in the near future. I hope to god the NBC is the first domino, but it looks like, and history teaches us, it's just the days catch.