Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
I am of the belief that bin Laden was armed when he was shot. There is just too much opportunity for the U.S. to keep him alive with what he knows and the importance he would have had. On the flip side, his wife that was there was there and used as a human shield was not killed, which makes me can't help but think that there actually might have been a "kill on sight" policy for bin Laden specifically.
I'm confushed.
|
The White House said he was not armed and he did not use any woman as a human shield, contrary to the first account of the events. They say he 'resisted.' I am not quite sure what that means.
I don't think that keeping him alive would be beneficial in any circumstance.