Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
Having an uninformed opinion predicated entirely upon taking the side that you desperately hope prevails is pretty much invalid.
|
Funny thing is that I actually
did take Law (my initial desire was to be a lawyer) so my opinion is probably one of the more "informed" around here - that said, I'm not about to start calling people out for not having any legal background in a discussion such as this one.
The law is open to interpretation which is why we can have this discussion in the first place, and there have been cases I've studied where the legal mind in me says outcome 'x' is correct but the courts ruled with outcome 'y'. Wouldn't be the first time, certainly wouldn't be the last.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
In this case I'm getting sick of hearing certain posters shift things around time and time again to suit their argument. Pro-Winnipeg = absolutely correct every single time.
|
I could turn around and say that Pro-Phoenix = absolutely delusional every single time (and I'd be wrong - with the exception of Bouw, who must be actively overdosing on happy pills every time he posts).
I don't shift things around. I have maintained the same position since this debacle began.