Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
I dunno, if the GWI has an official city document that unambigously states that the city owns the parking rights... well that sounds like a pretty significant blow to the legal argument for any financing scheme that involves bonds based on everything we've heard unless they can find some thing else of reasonable value that the team can provide the city in order to back said bonds.
|
It certainly would be, but there are still 'ifs' involved there. GWI could have something that they interpret to say x when in reality it says y. Heck, GWI could have a document they know says y and are saying it says x as a means to gain more backing. Both sides are playing the game here, both have their own agendas, and neither seem to be overly concerned with fighting completely fair.