Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Wow, care to read my post? I even quoted what was illegal about it. Jesus Christ, I had no idea the pro-Phoenix camp was this thick.
The report suggests there might be $50 million in CoG bond sales directed to Hulsizer's purchase. To GWI, it doesn't matter if it's $100 million or $50 million - it's still an illegal subsidy and it will be challenged.
|
Did you read your post? Because the one I responded to was four words.
At least you've made it clear what you're actually arguing, that GWI thinks it's illegal and therefore it is. Humorous really, one side says it's illegal, one side says it's legal, both have legal opinions backing their stance (although one sides come from outside legal counsel and one is doing it in house and has an agenda, although that doesn't change the fact that either could be right) and yet you have decided that GWI is correct. Any particular reason why that argument is so clearly correct? You're well versed in Arizona's gift clause law I assume? Get your LLM in it?
The point being that this isn't cut and dry, it could be perfectly legal or it could be a slam dunk for GWI. Acting like it's clearly one way or the other is nonsense.