05-04-2011, 04:59 PM
|
#40
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
When has Billboard Top 100 been a pop music chart? It has R&B, Rap, Hip-Hop, Rock, Dance, Pop, etc.
"Pop" is a specific genre. It does not simply mean "music that is popular". Michael Jackson didn't switch to grunge and he still remained popular throughout the 90s. Grunge was just a fad among white people who were sick of the glam rock and glam pop of the 80s and wanted to wear flannel and boots.
Make a new thread.
|
I would say "Pop" has at least two meanings.
Literally, what is "popular" - your top 40 hits. Ex. Lady Gaga
And as a "sound" - catchy, light, hook-laden music. Ex. XTC
Some bands fit both criteria.
http://www.allmusic.com/explore/styl...-pop-rock-d419
Pop/rock might seem like an overly vague designation -- after all, rock & roll was catchy and melodic long before it was thought of as pop music, and from the early '60s on, nearly all pop reflected the influence of rock & roll in one way or another. But pure pop took a while to become comfortable with rock's insistent backbeat, and it wasn't until the dawn of the '70s -- around the time when rock & roll's first-generation fans were settling into adulthood -- that truly equal pop/rock fusions became the epitome of mainstream music (as opposed to pre-rock vocal pop, which still commanded a sizable adult audience for most of the '60s). Naturally, pop/rock's primary focus was on melody -- as big, catchy, and instantly memorable as possible, whether the song was a rocker, ballad, or midtempo in-betweener. But the other, less immediately apparent aspect of pop/rock was its emphasis on the professional craft of record-making. The songs were tightly constructed, with no wasted space or prolonged detours from the melodic hooks. The production was clean, polished, and bright, making full use of the advances in recording technology (and technique) that had taken place over the course of the '60s. In general, pop/rock was catchy and energetic enough to appeal to younger listeners, but clean and safe enough for adults as well. Pop/rock, however, was not soft rock; it's important to realize -- hard as it may be to imagine today -- that the big hooks, rock instrumentation, and definite backbeat gave pop/rock an energy that would have been too edgy for more conservative listeners who hadn't grown up with rock & roll.
Last edited by troutman; 05-04-2011 at 05:02 PM.
|
|
|