View Single Post
Old 04-26-2011, 01:15 PM   #25
MickMcGeough
First Line Centre
 
MickMcGeough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
I did not interpret the stat (for what it's worth), and I do confess to being familiar with the conclusion only. Though I must admit I am discouraged that you would discount the entire thread with such little effort - and make the baffling conclusion that I extrapolated gun ownership into phony crime statistics.
I didn't say you interpreted the stats. I said that it had been interpreted before being reported here. And it was interpreted with an agenda.

For example:

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Actual Study
The likelihood of being stopped by police in 2002 did not differ significantly among white (8.7%), black (9.1%), and Hispanic (8.6%) drivers.

Police were more likely to search a vehicle driven by a black (7.1%) driver than by a white (2.9%) driver.
So, if you were summarizing that objectively, you'd say "Police aren't significantly more likely to stop a black driver than a white driver, but they're 2.4x more likely to search the vehicle."

But instead:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
Fact: Black and Latino men are three times more likely than white men to be stopped by the police and have their cars searched.
See, that's not a fact. That's a rounded up number. By somebody who's bad at math.

Anyway - I also never claimed that the police/justice system isn't racist, though I see plenty of people were happy to imply that. On the contrary, I don't know how anyone could look at the actual numbers and claim otherwise. I'd just rather see the numbers quoted from the study.

I didn't like Sicko but that doesn't mean the States didn't have a problem with health care.
__________________

MickMcGeough is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MickMcGeough For This Useful Post: