Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow
I believe they did.. in the event the sale went forward
|
This is the part I don't understand, the GI has a right to sue, any citizen does in order to enforce the law.
Only one party is private in the deal, and both the city and the GI represent the taxpayers, so how is it interference?
I mean I understand it does interfere with the sale, but it is a perfectly legal lawsuit.
This strikes me as being in the same ballpark as a group of shareholders suing the board of a company in a takeover battle.