Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Okey, but you're neglecting to mention that the CPC's logical response to such underlaying assumptions (specifically the assumption that E v. W is a zero-sum game & your "safest course" conclusion) is also to ignore Alberta. I mean... why bother pandering to Alberta if your going to get their votes regardless of what you do? If that assumption is true then the more efficient course of action is to pander to the other entity thereby creating a net negative to Alberta.
Being a near monotone voting block is ultimately self-harming behavior. Diversification is, as they say, the key to success.
|
Ask the PCs about that. They pissed the west off and it led to the downfall of their party.