The column is Rick Bell's spin on what Nenshi thinks about the bridge, it may not be Nenshi's thinking exactly. My take on Nenshi's previous statements on the bridge in the past is that he is not opposed to either foot-bridges or avant-garde architecture projects, but he does oppose bad public process, and the process that led us to the bridge -- even if it did or does have a positive outcome in the end -- was seriously flawed and must be fixed. In cliche: the ends do not justify the means.
|