Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Nonsense.
Both are for people to go and enjoy...or not. Depends on what they like.
Taxpayer money is taxpayer money. One should never take precedence over the other simply because...well I dont know why.
If the arena is a place that generates many thousands of people enjoyment for whatever may be taking place inside of it, how does that differ from a museum doing the same thing for others?
|
Totally agree.
You couldn't pay me to go to a museum. Art is there for the people who enjoy it. The people who enjoy it are the ones who should be paying the premium.
Same goes for hockey arenas. I also think neither should get the money, but why the double standard when it comes to art and museums?