Quote:
Originally posted by BlackArcher101+Sep 11 2004, 08:39 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (BlackArcher101 @ Sep 11 2004, 08:39 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mean Mr. Mustard@Sep 11 2004, 10:34 PM
So you donate blood to find out you have West Nile when they test it. Is that the question. How does that involve morals?
Edit: Ethics to morals.
|
Is it moral only to donate blood to find out if you have a west nile, not to donate because you want to help others. Moral: concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character
It's really a no brainer, I just posted it for fun after it popped into my mind. [/b][/quote]
Since this thread's going this way now, I'll put in my two cents.
I would say it's 'moral' (I'm not really sure if it's the right word, but I'll go with it) to donate blood because you want to save a strangers life.
If you're donating blood just to find out if you have WNV, it's not moral. You're doing a good thing, but your motivations aren't "moral" and "good"...you know?