Tons of circumstantial evidence - no doubt in my mind he is convicted.
Claims he "bought" the victim's car for 40$
Writes a "script" about how exactly the murder went down, including details (body in the sewer, luring via POF) that he couldn't have know about.
Images of a man who was previously attacked 2 weeks prior from the garage were in his browser history (which is also detailed in his script).
The whole Dexter thing - which the prosecutor will obviously try to play up (but in reality should have no bearing on the case)
Debit card receipt found at the garage (last 4 digits of his debit card matched) for a drop cloth, which was not used at the "film location", after he claimed he hadn't been to the crime scene.
Basically every piece of evidence aside from a knife in his hand.
Really stupid for committing the murder the way he did - probably would never have been caught if he just picked a random street walker to start with. Fact that guy who was being lured told his friend he went to a garage and discovered a man was there (not a women) - was what really broke the case.
Funny how these cases hinge on 1 small detail. If the guy didn't tell his friend where he was going that night, Twitchell would likely still be a free man.
Last edited by CaramonLS; 03-29-2011 at 10:04 PM.
|