Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
You gave only excuses for the irresponsibility many gay men show towards their own bodies and that of their dates. None of your excuses takes away the basic fact that they are responsible for their actions. If a gay man has unprotected sex he is just as responsible for his actions and outcome as another man who choses to drink and drive.
Being a responsible adult should be fair requirement of any potentual parent.
I'm just demonstrating the silliness of the commonly used term "homophobia" by useing it in reverse. However, in this case you did by your own declaration quit reading my post after reading something you disagreed with. You in effect closed your mind. It is ironic you are accusing me of the same thing.
Well if you hadn't quit reading my post you would have known I was suggesting that the medical history of the potentual adopted parent should be investigated in order to determine responsible behaviour. Of course all applicants should submit to the same standard.
Your political agenda is one of "gay rights". What it really is is "gay priviledges" because a marriage licence or an adoption certificate are not rights but, priviledges given by the State to those who meet certain requirements.
Your focus is on what you see as fair to homosexuals when adoption should always be centered on the best interests of the child.
|
Oh my god... ughh...
I did read the rest of your post and it was stupid.
Do you even know what a phobia is? Its a fear of something? did i post anywhere in here where i claimed to be afraid of something? no... The reason homophobia as a term is thrown around so much is because people tend to shut down ANYTHING when it comes to open sexuality...
And i dont have an agenda, i would love for there to be equal rights and that the ignorance and bigotry and hate people like you throw around would just die out (and it is). Your claim that adoption and marriage is a privilege is ####ing stupid, if marriage was so important they wouldn't allow people to get quickie marriages while drunk in Vegas... You are trying to prevent a couple from adopting a child based on the fact that they are Gay. If you really think the negative influences of having gay parents is stronger than having loving parents with strong socioeconomic status and no history of violence... well than you ARE an idiot. As i said before the relationship(of having gay parents and potential deviance) between the two would be minuscule compared to other factors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
Responsible for having unprotected sex.
|
That doesn't even make sense... What does that have to do with anything? Who here said gay couples didn't take responsibility for having sexual relations...
The problem with this is that many people believe what they want to believe, they pull #### out of their asses like "having gay parents is hard on the kids" when they have no statistical evidence that this is true. Having done the schooling and done the countless hours of research i am speaking from an educated standpoint. A position many people do not come from.
Regardless, the change in times is coming, like i said, in 10-15 years i bet gays have the exact same rights as us, i bet they are looked upon more equally than they are now. The fact that 80% of the people on this forum believe they should be allowed to get married is a testament to that. The Anti-Gay crowd is dying.