Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerSVT
Because right now gays are not responsible for their own actions? Please elaborate on that one.
|
You gave only excuses for the irresponsibility many gay men show towards their own bodies and that of their dates. None of your excuses takes away the basic fact that they are responsible for their actions. If a gay man has unprotected sex he is just as responsible for his actions and outcome as another man who choses to drink and drive.
Being a responsible adult should be fair requirement of any potentual parent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerSVT
Where exactly do i show a phobia of anything other than idiocy and close mindedness...
|
I'm just demonstrating the silliness of the commonly used term "homophobia" by useing it in reverse. However, in this case you did by your own declaration quit reading my post after reading something you disagreed with. You in effect closed your mind. It is ironic you are accusing me of the same thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerSVT
What political agenda do i have? Gays should be allowed to do anything straight people should, there are ####### straight couples and i am sure there are ####### gay parents, as long as the screening is the same it shouldnt matter. Kids who get adopted into loving families will always be better than those put in foster care.
|
Well if you hadn't quit reading my post you would have known I was suggesting that the medical history of the potentual adopted parent should be investigated in order to determine responsible behaviour. Of course all applicants should submit to the same standard.
Your political agenda is one of "gay rights". What it really is is "gay priviledges" because a marriage licence or an adoption certificate are not rights but, priviledges given by the State to those who meet certain requirements.
Your focus is on what you see as fair to homosexuals when adoption should always be centered on the best interests of the child.