Quote:
|
Climate science is where the funding is. There's boatloads of money to be made in the save the planet hysteria, and climatologists want to eat as well. Simple as that.
|
I don't buy this argument at all. Don't you think there's even bigger boatloads of money to be made from industry groups who want to seed uncertainty and doubt about current climate science?
Not to mention science is inherently self-correcting. That's the beauty of the scientific method and peer-review -- anyone repeating the same experiments under the same conditions should receive the same results. If the science was flawed, there are industry groups with VERY deep pockets who would be paying big bucks to discredit every study linking man-made CO2 emissions to climate change.