[mikey_the_redneck]

The science is definately not complete, and there is no consenus among the science community, although I get why people would perceive it that way.

The corporate mainstream media typically only shows one side of the debate, and gives very little attention to alternate perspectives, and even mocks them at times.

The climate alarmists/activists have went and dis-credited themselves by making things up, exaggerating and fear mongering. Between climate-gate, himalayan-gate and the UK court that ruled Al Gore's film to be tragically flawed, this makes it hard for the public to trust the science now.

They are even so desparate as to use shock advertising showing AGW deniers being blown up for having an alternate opinion.

The IPCC is a political panel, not a balanced science panel. That's why it is called the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. It seems that the IPCC has no variety or dissenting views among them. That to me, shows a bias.

And then there is the great solution the elites came up with to have a carbon tax system in place. Any pin-head can figure out that carbon taxes are not going to save the planet from anything, especially since China, India etc. are not willing to participate. It would basically halt growth in western nations and make everything in our lives more expensive, so we are all living a 3rd world lifestyle. The banks meanwhile, will make money from carbon trading, and will collect the taxes, to then lend out at interest to these other countries to develop "green" energy technology.

If you're a fan of big-brother and big-government, then carbon taxes and agenda 21 are for you!