Quote:
Originally Posted by arloiginla
I'm going to hope you're joking about wikipedia.
If not, you're an idiot.
|
Wikipedia is a great resource, it usually has enough info to give a general idea and the real resource is it usually have references to more substantive articles.
There's nothing wrong with Wikipedia for what it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Again what did he do that was lying or "misrepresenting" at 1:30 of the video? That is the point you said he was "lying". He was talking about the Freedom of Information Act at that point.
|
Why do you want to know? You've demonstrated your ability to reasonably discuss points like that in the past, so there's no point in going into details, is there? If I say what it is, will that result in a meaningful rational discussion? You'll have to convince me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
So far you have just name called.
|
No, saying someone lied is not calling them a name, it's calling the statement they made untrue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
The usual tact of a AGW zealot.
|
Hey look, so far you have just name called.
How many threads on AGW have I started, if I'm such a zealot? A zealot should have started far more than zero.
So you said I called someone a name, which I didn't, and then said that was the usual tact (did you mean tactic?) of an AGW zealot (which I'm not, and it isn't the usual tactic, that's just rhetoric to make an emotional point when a real one can't be made).
One might say you misrepresented things to your own ends!
