Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
Statistically, 50 years or even 2000 years means very little. Real measures of climate change, Co2 levels, and solar activity need to be examined on a much larger scale.
There is plenty of evidence out there and scientists who believe in solar activity (and other geological, meteorological and even biological feedback loops) as being the major contributors to climate change. Go and look yourself if you really have an open and curious mind. I guarantee it is out there. It simply is not proliferated as much as all the material on the unobjective and unpartisan global warming material that is thrown out ad nauseam all over the internet. Read scientific journals, scholarly articles, etc. When I was at university, I'd use my account to look up journals or pull random ones at the library to read. It's out there. Do it yourself. I don't like people who post mass produced graphs and charts on the internet and go: "THERE EVIDENCE!". I could easily do that and not prove anything except reliance on shoddy populist internet information (see above).
|
If by shoddy populist internet information, you mean University courses taught by PhD's who have studied the area for decades, then yes, you are correct.