Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Wrong country. Not a chance you get a court to hear an injunction proceeding that far in advance of the bonds coming into existence, injuctions are for imminent threats to the interests of a party. US courts do not give advice on hypothetical matters.
|
There has to be a way to have sorted this way earlier, a smaller partial bond issue just to precipitate the action, and there has to be a reason the city has blocked every attempt to have the deal and the finances looked at way earlier.
Had they made the paperwork available in 2009 when asked the issue of whether the GI was going to sue would have been sorted and they could then have made plans around it.
It makes no sense to do what the city has done or how they have acted if the deal is legal.