Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
That's the part of this I dont get at all.
How does a private (non-elected) enterprise with a clear agenda, over-rule (by use of threat) elected officials of the public?
It's assinine and a really frightening precedent IMO.
I don't care one way or the other where the team plays or even if it plays, but seeing this kind of outside interfence happen to a publicly elected board is really bothersome.
|
But that's the other side of the arguement the
publicly elected officials are pledging public money to fund a
privately owned franchise for someone else. Oh and they're buying parking rights they already own. I'm over simplifying this probably but that's the gist I get from it