Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
That's the part of this I dont get at all.
How does a private (non-elected) enterprise with a clear agenda, over-rule (by use of threat) elected officials of the public?
It's assinine and a really frightening precedent IMO.
I don't care one way or the other where the team plays or even if it plays, but seeing this kind of outside interfence happen to a publicly elected board is really bothersome.
|
I don't know if GWI is right, but they are saying the bond sale is an illegal gift. Shouldn't public officials be held accountable for illegal actions? Wouldn't that be more frightening if elected bodies could ignore the law?