Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moon
Does his professionalism include the multitude of cheap shots and kicks to the backs of players legs?
Keane is a good player but if he ever made a World 11 or was considered for one then it only could have been because the selector was a Man U honk or the options were very weak.
Roy Keane is a good player but Gazza was much better when he came to Scotland and is overall a much much better player.
I sure this will help Celtic while they are trying to qualify for Europe and Rangers are moving on in the knockout stage. I would say that Keane could help Celtic out here but seeing as they have never experienced it and never will I guess it will have to be left to wonder if he would have helped Rangers as they go through.
|
Spare me the pro Rangers ****, I'm not pro-celtic or man u, I'm not even european. The Celtic will never go through and Rangers have na-na-na crap is pointless, I don't care about it - aren't both clubs almost the exact same size? What would bring you to conclude that one team will never go through the champions league? I think celtic actually have won the European Cup already haven't they - before the current format but your view is kinda weird. Keane's professionalism refers to his will to win and his hard work in training as oposed to Gazza's late night partying and no winners medals in his career outside scotland. Was Vinny Jones unprofessional because he was hard on the pitch? If you think Gazza was a better player than fine I respect that opinion but certainly don't share it. They are totally different players in different positions and while I have no love for Man U they won the lot and Keane was their engine in midfield.