Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP
Those OPS's are worse than EE's career average of .790. EE makes 1/8th the salary and is locked up for one year, giving us the flexibility to promote Lawrie whenever he's ready. Why would we replace EE with a guy who's very likely going to produce about the same, but be locked into him for 3 more years at a ridiculously inflated salary?
Michael Young = Vernon Wells 2.0. I don't get why people want to add another aging, declining, and over-rated veteran immediately after dumping one.
|
It is my perception that Young is a clutch player etc.
I suppose it doesn't help that I do not think very much of EE. Seems he is cold for most of the time and then gets 3 homers off a weak pitcher.