http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion...082/story.html
Did we hear right? Aldermen are quoted as worried a fluoridation plebiscite would mean "a small number (of voters) would determine the issue for all Calgarians." As well, a plebiscite would be "absolutely unacceptable," and would be a "tyranny of the majority."
Are they fearful of the same process that gave them a job? As for ethics, how ethical is it for Ald. Druh Farrell to pursue a seemingly personal agenda while shunning expert advice and the public's right to decide?
This is what we would call a tyranny of ignorance. Kudos to those aldermen who resisted this debacle.
Darcy Isted, DDS, and Glen Cowitz, DDS, Calgary