Quote:
Originally Posted by something
I am wary of even the experts. It seems a paradox to label two people an expert when their evidence is contradictory. Therefore, I find an "informed" decision to be elusive.
You're right that it is an issue about personal liberty. For me, it is. However, I still find, that given my bias (admittedly, a predisposition to certain "evidence") I have still formed what I believe to be a reasonable conclusion. This conclusion is corroborated by the notion that I consider it reasonable not to be exposed to additives and chemicals, whose efficacy and safety are under scrutiny, while consuming a public resource.
That's just my take.
|
honestly I think this just may be too complicated for some people to understand. The revile at logic must be motivated by some fear of change because the majority of those who advocate fluoride have trouble forming a logical counterpoint that actually accounts for this central idea (that many detractors hold)