photon honestly i just dont think you're getting it or your choosing to ignore what the point. i honestly dont care to debate it further. my statement is quite simple and is 100% fact.
shaw and telus were products of a monopoly for cable and telephone in alberta and bc. the bulk of their infrastructure that they've worked off since was established during this monopoly. for a competitor to build the same infrastructure makes no fiscal sense unless they get huge grants from the government. shaw and telus dont have a debt to the public, but the goverment does have the responsibility to step in and prevent price gouging when a monopoly or duopoly exists.
if you disgree thats fine but thats the simple reality as i see it and many canadians do, too.
|