Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
I hope the parents get multiple books thrown at them for this. Their negligence resulted in the permanent disfigurement of their child.
|
I don't know about that, unless we know the facts. We used to own a ferret and it was the most timid animal; it never bit anyone. What constitutes neglegience? Is it owning a pet that has the potential to do this to a child or the fact that the animal maimed the child? If it's the former, then perhaps anyone who owns a dog or cat and has an infant should also be charged as you suggest. This may just be a very unfortunate turn of events but I don't know if it constitutes neglegience.
Whatever, this is terrible.