Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
I just don't like the "guilty without having done anything wrong" aspect of this case. Perhaps she is an alcoholic. But unless there is some sort of proof that she is driving impaired she shouldn't have her drivers license taken away. If she was to get caught drinking and driving AND show the markers for alcoholism, then perhaps I can see an argument. But in this case, someone with a clean driving record has lost her license without doing anything wrong.
|
I have no problem admitting that the fact she wasn't caught driving makes it a grey area, but if Alcoholism is listed as one of the medical conditions that prohibits a person from legally obtaining a license, than that's the way it is.
I'm not sure how to look this up, but I wonder if a doctor is also required to report a patient who has one of the other medical conditions listed earlier? If not, then that's probably the only case that could be made, as it would indicate discrimination.