Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt
The Charles Tillman snub was equally as bad as the Tramon snub, they both had fantastic seasons and were undercut for the probowl
I agree that the quarterback battle will be an important factor in the game, bit IMO it will come down to both teams' offensive line vs the opposing D line. While I won't
object that Cutler has his awful days I think too few times its realised that the Bears have one of,
if not one the worst offensive line in the league.
The biggest advantage Chicago has is the better running game. Forte has played well this season both running the ball and catching out of the backfield. They typically give him 30 touches a game to take pressure off Cutler's passing game and I don't think that changes this week.
|
I wasn't trying to undercut the Bears secondary, but IMO you coudl argue that the packers have the best secondary in the NFL so I think to say the Bears is as good, i have a tough time agreeing with. I will agree Tillman had a pretty nice bounce back year, but I just think overal the Pack have mroe talent and more dpeth in their secondary than Chicago.
No question the Bears have the better running back, but I do think Starks has certainly closed that gap. But i will give you that while the bears line struggles in pass portection i think they run block better than the Pack. The Pack offensive line is the opposite, so/so in run block but very good in pass protection if that continues it'll be a struggle.
The thing I meant with Culter is you still see him make at least 2 or 3 bad choices a game. Seahawks he threw that ball ont he goaline right into the hands of a defender, and then i believe it was a screen pass he put high and just about had it picked off. pack will make you pay for those choices and with a game that should be that close, it would easily decide the game.