View Single Post
Old 01-16-2011, 11:42 PM   #838
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
I fail to see how they're over rated at all. If anything they are under rated still, as despite winning the NFC they were still under dogs the entire season. While I think the Packers will beat the Bears, I fail to see how they will 'chew them up and spit them out' when they split their season series and the game they lost was only 10-3 IN Lambeau. GB's offence is much better, but to say their defence is better is ballsy, as they are very close and I would still say that the Bears' is better all around. Their LB core is just not close talent wise and their secondary and dline are very compareable.

Based on what?

GB gave up fewer yards, fewer points, had way more sacks, more INT's, and played a much tougher schedule. All this with 4LB's, 3 Safeties, 2 DE's and a CB on IR. In their last 6 games they have given up 91 points, or 15 points per game. 4 of those games against playoff teams.

The defense is what carried the Packers this year and is something most of the media simply doesn't grasp. No question Rodgers and company have started to really roll on the other side of the ball and that's what they all concentrate on, but that Packer D is a beast of late as well....and has been most of the year. Dom Capers has them firing on all cylinders...the man is a genius.

If this game was back in Lambeau I have no doubt the Packers would win going away. But because its in Chicago and it being a division rival, it will be agonizingly close. Probably a FG either way and the early line is the Packers -3. GB should have won the game in Soldier Field back in September but self-destructed and were flagged for 18 penalties. It was absurd.

Last edited by transplant99; 01-16-2011 at 11:45 PM.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote