looks like the WSJ took the more controversial parts of the book, gave their article a good name and caused outraged. Here's an article from SF with an interview with the author herself.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...apop011311.DTL
Quote:
|
"I was very surprised," she says. "The Journal basically strung together the most controversial sections of the book. And I had no idea they'd put that kind of a title on it. But the worst thing was, they didn't even hint that the book is about a journey, and that the person at beginning of the book is different from the person at the end -- that I get my comeuppance and retreat from this very strict Chinese parenting model."
|