View Single Post
Old 01-04-2011, 10:31 AM   #54
Meelapo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Absolutely untrue. If the issue is an issue of load/capacity then charging for caps does NOTHING to alleviate capacity shortages. Throttling is only effective for capacity, a practice they are well versed in using.

They have never proven that there are significant capacity issues. They have never revealed any network data showing that caps help them technically. They are charging overages at hundreds if not thousands of times the marginal cost of provding that extra GB of downstream bandwidth.

This is clearly anti-competive monopolist practices. I can't believe you would defending it.

If you really want UBB then sure, lets go there. Lets pay for each and every bit that you download at some standardized rate. So Grandma and Grandpa emailing their kids will pay $5 a month and Mr. Netflix pays $40 a month. Treat bits like utilities treat kWh. That's real UBB not this crap that these companies are ramming down our throats.
I like this "pay for what you use" model.
Meelapo is offline   Reply With Quote