View Single Post
Old 01-03-2011, 09:19 PM   #36
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
Telus' offerings are pretty similar, not that far off. Shaw has the lower caps, but the overage fee's are lower. It's a matter of when Telus starts enforcing, not if.

Telus / Shaw
High Speed Turbo 125GB ($2/GB add'l) / High Speed Extreme 100GB ($1/GB add'l)
High Speed 75GB ($2/GB add'l) / High Speed 60GB ($2/GB add'l)
High Speed Lite 13GB ($5/GB add'l) / High Speed Lite 15GB ($2/GB add'l)

http://www.telus.com/content/interne...ed/compare.jsp
Thanks for the updated number. After I posted I suspected that the stuff I posted might not have been current, since it was from an intermediate source, so I am glad you found the correct info directly from Telus.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
With Telus there is no way they dont know the amount of bw each customer uses, they just choose for the moment not to release that data. If they decide to match the supposedly new Shaw policy then they will be releasing the data useage statistics.

I am firmly on the side of traffic shaping at peak times rather than bandwidth charges. Bandwidth is essentially free, the only expense is the infrastructure and maintenance required.
Telus claims that they currently don't have a system set up to determine which services are using which bandwidth, since all of their offerings use the same 'type' of traffic. I have no reason to doubt these claims, and assuming they are correct, it really wouldn't take much for them to accurately implement and test the tracking.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."

Last edited by Rathji; 01-03-2011 at 09:22 PM.
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote