Yup I agree, the chain of logic gets called into question at step two, to say spinal manipulation is improving the "master control system", we'd need to first determine that the control system is in need of improving (which is what subluxations are supposed to be but don't exist EDIT: the chiro definition I mean, a medical subluxation is real and can be seen), and then determine that the action changes something (which if you can't see subluxations, makes it kind of difficult). Of course you can just say that they must exist because the manipulation had an effect, but that's a different logical error.
Plus there's tons of conditions that would still exist regardless of how well the master control system is running, and he admits that with the missing limb thing, so I gave the benefit of the doubt for now and just skipped that.
|