People who ride in ambulances end up in intensive care afterwards. Therefore, it is recommended people avoid ambulance rides.
As logical as your discredited research below.
Hope you get into your PhD program and learn biomechanics.
If you think chiropractors take a joint past normal anatomical range, I feel really really scared for your patients, assuming you actually treat the public. Wow. That is just ignorant.
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume 64, Issue 8, pages 1162–1165, July 2010
Summary
Objective: The aim of this study was to summarise all cases in which chiropractic spinal manipulation was followed by death.
Design: This study is a systematic review of case reports.
Methods: Literature searches in four electronic databases with no restrictions of time or language.
Main outcome measure: Death.
Results: Twenty six fatalities were published in the medical literature and many more might have remained unpublished. The alleged pathology usually was a vascular accident involving the dissection of a vertebral artery.
Conclusion: Numerous deaths have occurred after chiropractic manipulations. The risks of this treatment by far outweigh its benefit
I'd like to see your degree first because quite frankly this has turned into a who can quote the better website arguement with very little being said to explain why the practices of a chiropractor are better then the rest (aside from your absolutely adorable comparison between a personal trainer and physiotherapist). I'd love to hear how Chiropractor feels that pushing a body past it natural range of motion is more helpful then harmful to an injury. And why they use techniques of force, rather then natural movement in order to produce a quicker result. Basic kinesiology tells us that the body is only meant to move within a range and any movements outside of this range create the injury. If the person has already done this and coming to you to seek treatment why is the treatment more movement beyond this range? When did two wrongs make a right?[/QUOTE]