Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
Although in your case things are pretty black and white. You have no obligation to stay and you are only responsible for yourself. The case is much different for the coach.
And the whole not holding a racist accountable? How has the hockey association had time to hold him accountable when the coach made his decision? Who made the coach the person who decides how the player who made the remarks should be held accountable?
The officials apparently didn't hear the remarks so it might have came down to a he said/she said situation. Is the ref supposed to kick a player out of the game for something their opponent claims they said? Do you not see the potential for abuse there?
Again, there are other options other than 'do nothing' or 'quit'.
|
How do you know he is not obliged to sit at the table?
Is he in a meeting, a vegas poker game, world arm wrestling competition, at the in-laws for dinner, CIA interrogation
So you are wrong it is not black and white