Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
In that case it WOULD be based on a moral standard.
From the judges decision:
Quote:
|
Of all the daughters, Lorraine contributed the most towards caring for her parents and performing household duties. ,,, She continued to do all the household work and tended to her father’s needs with respect to hospital and doctors visits and to do his banking. After a dispute with her father about the necessity of also tending to Randall, Lorraine left her father’s house. However she continued to visit her father on a regular basis, especially as his health deteriorated. She made sure to visit when Randall was not there. She visited her father at least four times per week, cooked his food, provided extra food and cleaned the house as best she could.
|
Seems like the father was quite the a-hole. To give nothing to the person that took care of you when you were ill.... |
The father may well have been an a-hole, seems that he was, but that bolded section right there is more than enough rationale for the decision not to include this particular daughter.